If you build it they do not come : what (almost) everybody gets wrong about startups

If you build it they do not come : what (almost) everybody gets wrong about startups

Title: Sell First, Build Later: Why Startups Often Misstep When Building Before Selling

What follows draws on hard-won experience from the startup world. After navigating countless lessons the hard way, I’ve seen a consistent pattern: many teams get it wrong, even when seasoned entrepreneurs, mentors, and books emphasize a different approach. In reality, those who manage to scale from zero to tens of millions in annual recurring revenue frequently achieve it by following the contrarian path that emphasizes early market validation over early product creation.

The core idea is simple: most aspiring founders begin with a product idea and pursue an MVP as the initial step, becoming tethered to sunk costs. Building a demonstrable product before validating demand often proves costly and counterproductive. As a technically minded founder, I initially believed a tangible demo would accelerate adoption, but experience proved otherwise.

Indeed, you don’t necessarily need a finished product to sell it. In our case, we built an AI platform intended to solve a specific problem, yet the market hadn’t crystallized around it. The hype around AI helped secure initial funding, but prior ventures without strong demand didn’t fare as well.

Today, the focus is on identifying the most effective “trojan horse” approach—something that addresses a pressing need and pulls customers onto the platform. We began by brainstorming target markets, buyer personas, and potential use cases, and then we pursued sales first. The process looked like: create cohorts of prospective customers, measure their responses and engagement, and actually move through a sales cycle. To our surprise, we closed our first deal before building the product, because the customers were eager to adopt a solution that would deliver real value.

This approach also reshaped our understanding of the offering. Instead of presenting a fixed concept, we tested hypotheses with real conversations: “Is this a big enough problem for you? Would this proposed solution work? What would you be willing to pay? What’s the compelling business case?” Feedback enabled rapid evolution of the value proposition in ways that building first would have prevented.

Key takeaway: start with selling, not building. An MVP isn’t a prerequisite.

There are anecdotes of other paths as well. For example, a personal-shopping SaaS founder began by delivering services in person (organized via spreadsheets) and then transitioned to a scalable online model once demand was proven and funding followed. This pattern—proving demand through service or pilot sales—often makes funding inquiries far more compelling. After all, portraying a path to scale with validated customer traction is more persuasive than presenting an untested product concept.

Funding considerations also shift when you sell first. With a proven sales narrative, you can outline current customers, price points, and the projected impact of scale—articulating operational efficiencies and revenue growth. This clarity tends to win support more readily than the pitch for an unproven product. It’s important to acknowledge that selling—even successful products—remains a distinct discipline from product development, and not all founders are equally skilled at both. Nonetheless, validating demand early can dramatically reduce risk and accelerate fundraising.

The contrast is stark when comparing product-first versus sales-first trajectories. A founder who bootsstrapped and built sales momentum from the outset can retain greater ownership, while those chasing rapid product development may encounter dilution through successive rounds, especially if early traction remains elusive.

In short: prioritize selling to validate demand, then build to scale. This mindset has the potential to shorten time-to-market, improve product-market fit, and create a stronger case for investment. If you’re evaluating your startup strategy, consider starting with sales conversations and real customer feedback before committing to a full product build. The evidence suggests that this approach can lead to faster, more sustainable growth.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *